People Mover Comparison – Nissan Caravan vs Toyota HiAce
Blog Home » Car Review » People Mover Comparison – Nissan Caravan vs Toyota HiAce

People Mover Comparison – Nissan Caravan vs Toyota HiAce

Designed as light commercial fleet vehicles, the Nissan Caravan and Toyota HiAce vans certainly look the part, with simple and functional design features, making them useful and practical. Looking at the two vehicles, you'll note they share a similar boxy shape, made to maximize interior space for cargo, whether that cargo is goods stacked on pallets, or passengers. The cab-over design makes for a highly maneuverable vehicle, yet does present safety challenges for both vehicles, since the driver sits basically right on top of the engine and front wheels.

Toyota Van

The flexibility of the two platforms has made these two vehicles essential equipment for many companies. Whether the vehicle is being used domestic or abroad, new or second-hand, it is found that these vehicles are most commonly put to use as people movers (a term used for vehicles used for transporting large groups of people).

Nissan Caravan

The typical used Nissan Caravans on the market are from the late E24 series, produced in Kenya, and the early E25 series, produced in Japan, Angola, and the Philippines. The Nissan Caravan is also known as the Nissan Urvan or Homy, and the Isuzu COMO and is equipped with four-cylinder diesel and turbodiesel engines that range in displacement from 2.3ℓ to 3.2ℓ. The most common, are the 2.7ℓ turbodiesel i4, generating 96kW, and the 3.0ℓ i4 turbodiesel, generating 90kW, respectively. The five-speed manual transmission is most commonly set up for rear-wheel drive, but you can find some four-wheel drive Nissan Caravans out there. The Nissan Caravan carries up to 12 passengers, which makes for a great people mover, but can also be useful as an ambulance or cargo van.

Having somewhat of a late start in the 1970s, the Nissan Caravan model has been slow to develop over the years, for example the E24 series is still in production in Kenya, practically unchanged since its introduction in 1986. Even when Nissan came around to developing the E25, in 2001, it hadn't taken advantage of the extra engine power by expanding interior space. In a few years, when the E26 Nissan NV350 Caravan filters down to the secondary and export markets, expect to see improvement in interior space and passenger comfort.

Nissan Caravan

2005 Nissan Caravan

Toyota HiAce

The Toyota HiAce traces its history back to the late 1960s, with the introduction of the first HiAce cargo van, passenger van, and pickup truck. These were built for heavy-duty work, featuring economical and reliable engines with suspension systems to match. Part of the reliability has to do with HiAce’s simple design, which interestingly, has led to it being one of the most-stolen vehicles in Japan, since it also lacks an engine immobilizer. In the 1990s, the pickup was dropped, leaving Toyota HiAce only in van configurations. The fourth generation H100 HiAce vans were produced until 2004 (for the 2005 model year), later replaced by the fifth generation H200 HiAce van. The H100 was supplied with a variety of engine options, including gasoline, diesel, and turbodiesel. The transmission was paired with either a five-speed manual transmission or an optional four-speed automatic transmission, and was also available with four-wheel drive.

The H200, produced in seven countries, is also known as the Ses'fikile or Quantum in South Africa. It comes equipped with i4 engines running petrol or diesel fuel, from 2.0ℓ to 3.0ℓ, ranging in power output from 67kW to 126kW, commonly paired with a five-speed manual transmission, with optional four-speed automatic transmission or four-wheel drive. Additionally, the Toyota HiAce H200 also moved the shift lever to the dash for easier access.

Toyota HiAce

2005 Toyota HiAce

Comparison

For nearly a decade, the Nissan Caravan has outsold the Toyota HiAce, for a couple reasons: engine power and price. It is true that Nissan outclasses Toyota in the most commonly found models, which makes for good short-term sales. Nissan Caravan's E25 was also granted an ANCAP (Australian New Car Assessment Program) Five-Star Crash Safety Rating, where the Toyota HiAce H200 was only granted a Four-Star rating.

On the other hand, there is practically no other brand on the planet that can compete with Toyota's record of reliable engines and transmissions. Toyota HiAce typically runs more expensive than the Nissan Caravan but, as always, you get what you pay for. With proper maintenance, Toyota engines last longer and are more efficient. Additionally, as a people mover, the HiAce is more comfortable for passengers, thanks to better suspension characteristics and more interior space.

Like this article? Please share!

This entry was posted in Car Review, Car Comparison. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
  • follow us in feedly

  • Pages

  • Categories

  • Archives